I think that most ET contact experiences with ET are not negative in themselves or for humanity. People report voluntary and involuntary contact experiences and the voluntary (or mostly voluntary) ones should not be forgotten if we are to make a good assessment.
However, in spite of a general pattern, different kinds of abductions also appear to happen and details should be explored carefully. While the word "abduction" has an instant negative legal connotation (taken against one's free will) and many abductions reported are hurtful and abusive with beings responding in human indifferent ways, many other abductions are not so crass, the beings teach and share things assist and heal, communicate more, help to enhance the spirit, and relate to alleged pre-birth agreements. Moreover, as per Mary Rodwell's decade's long research, there also are children being willingly taken for instruction and having a good time at that. They do not feel traumatized by ETs but, rather, misunderstood by their parents.
Why always emphasize traumatizing types of abductions over everything else? Many contact experiences appear to be justified under agreements and deeper spiritual 'mechanics', so to speak. We ought to develop a more precise multidimensional, post-materialist metaphysics amenable to science to better understand.
The 5-year anonymous, international, scientific, FREE Experiencer Survey (with thousands of respondents) shows - from the experiencer perspective - that there are many types of ETs but, overall, the results of the contact experiences clearly appear as a beneficent influence on a majority of individuals.
Most experiences were after all positive and a majority of respondents did not want their experiences to end. If “by their fruits ye shall know them” is correct, why would ET contact be linked to more ethical human beings? In the midst of a society that prefers to report negative, and scary traumatizing events, the experiences that turned out to be beneficent found a place to leave information to contribute via the FREE Experiencer Survey.
The survey may clearly be a more accurate representation of the types of experiences there actually are. Using an anonymous survey allowing individuals to respond questions and narrate their experiences instead of cherry picking what testimonies to accept or dismiss according to our researcher's prejudices, is better to obtain a wide range of reports.
The FREE Experiencer report challenged several popular beliefs regarding ET contact. The positive side of contact experiences prevailed over the negative and this could reflect an objective truth or, alternatively (playing devil’s advocate) we could say that, since the survey requested conscious recall of contact memories, this may relate more with experiences that are more benign or positive which, in turn, could be associated with experiencers not needing or wanting to block the memories so much and/or with varieties of ET beings not trying to block their experiences.
Another factor seldom recognized is that – as a species - we psychologically tend to over-emphasize negative and threatening events or possibilities and this also may be skewing how we discuss the ET NH presence. However, I'd rather listen to thousands of anonymous experiences than to individual channelers producing extraordinary stories or narratives that enamor us with clear definitions and absolute generalizations that become popular to many. In fact, I surmise that in alternative thinking communities (and due to our openness of heart and tendency to believe that which not only seems coherent but that feels good), we tend to be quite receptive to almost any alternative story. From the benefit of the doubt, we may move into belief with dogmatisms accepting misinformation along with plausible-sounding statements that resonate with us.
Without different kinds of temporary "detainments" how else would a necessary operation requiring transportation to an ET environment be accomplished without major social-cultural imposition and disruption? The greater good for humanity and for the cosmic community may be at stake here and, if we do not know our forgotten cosmic history or who we are, how can we limit our judgment to modern, legal human terms? If the beings asked conscious permission to all people, they would have been admitted into society already changing it too much outside of its own natural self-motivated growth process. And how many would voluntarily go with them? Could most individuals understand these being’s reasons?
Then again, I don't think that flat-out "all ETs necessarily have a benign, pro-human agenda." However, I think that many (and most probably, most) do and very beautifully so in some cases like the Apunians from a future timeline in Alpha Centauri and the Orion-descending Morleans from Ganymede, or like the higher density Venusians sometimes described by physical contactees like Luis Fernando Mostajo.
The deep, serene, and vast sense of the sacred sometimes transmitted by some of these beings along with positive messages and a serious but loving treatment over decades of contact experiences include a reverence and respect for humanity...for what its original purpose was and what it can still become. Thank goodness (in spite for our ear for abductions in somber terms) there are many (friendlier in human terms) contactee experiences immortalized in books at least since the 1950s.
Let’s also read books by alleged and genuine contactees having or having had voluntary or mostly voluntary contact experiences such as Dana Howard, Gloria Lee, George Van Tassell, George Adamski, Truman Bethurum, Michel Desmarquet, Daniel Fry, Enrique Castillo Rincon, Enrique Mercado Orue, Ricardo Gonzalez, Luis Fernando Mostajo, Sixto Paz Wells, Carlos Paz Wells, Pablo Hawnser, Roberto Vargas de la Gala, Eduard Meier, Frank Stranges, George King, Stefan Danaerde, Elizabeth Klarer, Orfeo Angelucci, Calvin Parker, Italian Diplomat Alberto Perego, Stefano Breccia, Ida M. Kannenberg, Suzy Hansen, Jeff Selver, Monica De Medeiros, Helen Hurth, Dolly Safran, Peter Maxwell Slattery, and several others. In certain Spanish podcasts (like "El Nuevo Tiempo") the opportunity has also been given to several dozens of Latin American and Spanish experiencers/contactees whose message can also be sincere and important.
Some English and Spanish-speaking contactee-experiencers provided evidence of their contact experiences, are not self-centered-fanatical, nor too manipulative, and do not come across as individual channelers selling exciting stories or slanted/limited views on the contact experience acting (consciously or not) as disinformation agents combining plausible information with plausible concepts or fabricated cosmic sagas that entice and resonate with segments of our intuitions.
By all means, given that when "The Phenomenon" is close to human beings, it interfaces with our subjectivities, we have to lend an ear to individuals risking their reputations or being evidently humble and altruistic enough to come out publicly with their experiences. And, we should try to consider all of the information available comparatively, classify it, compare different sources and segments from most to least probable, and find commonalities.
This study is extensive and requires synthesis, nuance, patterns, flexible mental openness, listening to all possible pieces of the puzzle, choosing and connecting the more plausible ones, and being aware and self-corrective of our preferences biases excluding party of the experiential "corpus" of information.
However, in consideration of descriptions within the complexity of contact experiences, some ET-NH beings would also work more neutrally and/or scientifically (so to speak), not necessarily negative to humans. Others appear to be closer to the “space brother”- characteristics, for instance, described by many voluntary contactees in the 1950s and 1970s.
Different types of beings seem dedicated to accomplish different specific goals, albeit all of them with a no-nonsense diligence whether they could variously be judged as benign, neutral, or malevolent depending on a careful, (as objective as possible) consideration of the details. Some of these beings (I think a small minority actively interacting with Man) would definitely oppose a comprehensive human projects others are engaged in and, still others, would even despise and seek to manipulate humanity. Some contactees of the benevolent, more communicative "space brother" variety have warned that not all ET beings are benign and that should be taken into consideration (but without fear-mongering).
Extrapolating from experiencer data, we could say that there might be a vibrational frequency difference between us and them so that, quite often, ET "leaders" may not want to be exposed to it. Thus, in many cases, ET "leaders" appear to send the least advanced in their ranks clones or androids to come get us by interfacing, resonating with or getting closer to our physical densities, taking us physically, and returning us. If the contact experience is physical, this implies multiple levels of physicality and our concepts need to be expanded to accommodate that.
On another note, it stands to reason that most of these different ETs (that could well be physical on many levels and physically but also non-physically “interdimensional”) would have to have some sort of agreement or coordination among each other, that is, follow shared rules that not interfere with each other's goals. Some may associate under an overall approach and pursue different specific goals. Others may sharply disagree (for instance about the role that humanity may play in the future) but still have to coordinate and get along with the others because they may have been part of a larger whole of entities intervening on Earth for a long time and would have interests at stake along with the rest.
Unlike humans, under a less dichotomous or dualistic way of thinking both positive (service to others) and negative (service to self) would be able agree about operating under common rules of engagement and, for example, in particular cases among such oriented groups humans might even be caught as soldiers as proxies for them. Only in some occasions (for instance, when a particular species or group brakes the rules or when rogue elements want to intervene outside of who is allowed), policing forces would down crafts. In other cases, humans may be downing the less advanced craft again acting as proxies for a negative group providing some technology.
Some of the commonalities in the meaning of the contact experience on the human side could be that humanity can wake up and needs to wake up and change in order not to be replaced eliminated or controlled; that it has been assisted in favor and against regarding its own freedom and evolution; and that humanity is an experiment combining genetic material from many benign and malevolent (advancing and delaying) civilizations. We also have to study the messages of hope and promise and “deep history” apparently given to many contactees, implying that the contact program in general is much more of an opportunity than a threat (under a non-fear-based perspective). Perhaps (as some ET messages say) humanity is meant to surprise many civilizations in the cosmos that invested efforts in us, surprising them with something unique that (in spite of our current state of geopolitical disassembly) may show the way to others.
In the meantime (whether preferred by all members of the cosmic civilization or not), more radical, species-modifying hybridizations seem to be acceptable in the "near-Earth" cosmic community, perhaps as a commitment to help some ET species or “races” and/or in case humanity doesn't wake up sufficiently and (to protect the cosmic dynamics) has to be replaced with a more ecological and emotionally balanced …responsible species.
Thus, explored under a dualistic mindset, several seemingly opposing plans may seem incompatible in these complex dynamics but compatible at last as a whole and the end goal may include in one form or another the rise of a universal principles-based human, super-human, homo noeticus species that would be more mentally and emotionally balanced; a post-short-term tribal and identity survivalist and even a universal Love-based entity rather than a stubborn fear and separation-based one with an attachment to ignorance. Under an integral plan overseeing multiple possible outcomes highly pro-human self-development ETs, neutral-practical ETs, and even anti-human ETs may coincide and we may also have to complexify (and simultaneously integrally simplify) our thinking patterns to be able to truly understand and start a loftier conversation with ET.
Giorgio Piacenza
Comments
Post a Comment