Two Essays in the Works:: Reconciling Theories About Reality & Human Adaptation to Trans-Ontological Entities
The quotidian experience of
spatial and temporal separation of events situated in a “dense” physical
reality whose exteriors patterns are quite rigidly fixed provides materialist
science (and its methods to discover these patterns and to manipulate them via
external means) with many arguments in favor of physicalism. And physicalism
supports our blind continuing to seek solutions to life’s problems in the
primitive (separation-based, xenophobic, anthropocentric) ways we continuously
fall back into… even with the advanced technology we are developing. But “paranormal” events as well as contact
events with intelligent beings that appear to move across different realities
challenge this view.
It is easier to accept quantum
physics than the paranormal because the first it readily explains ‘anomalies’
like the “black box effect” and it was readily applied to technological
innovations that produced practical physical applications. But – following this
line of thought - the practical applications of a science that includes what
today is called “the paranormal” would be more fundamentally challenging to our
intuitive, adaptational, physicalist sense of reality and, since its effects
would include the manipulation of otherwise stable patterns of spacetime and
matter. Thus, it would appear much more “magical” than what has been developed
by the application of quantum mechanics thus far. This would challenge the West’s rejection of
Magic both during the Theocratic-Medieval era and in the Modern era.
Said differently, adapting to a greater
manifestation of the ‘paranormal’ and to a clearer understanding of how it comes
to be may pose a superlative challenge to the instinctive sense of reality most
humans (myself included) are born with. However, without this challenge (and
our species’ worldwide adaptation to it) we may soon destroy ourselves, and the
ecology of the planet falling into extreme dehumanization and/or extinction because
our sense of separation (for instance, expressed as political tribalism and
over- exploitation of natural resources) is incongruous with the technologies
we are developing.
Therefore, the question arises
whether the human species can integrate this new understanding and its potential
applications into its practical life. In any case, the required “shift’ in how
we sense, feel, and treat reality and the ‘paranormal’ would be so fundamental
and unprecedented as to make us think about ourselves as a qualitatively different
species, a species based on higher principles of unity that organize the cosmos.
Moreover, I suspect that if we are to be treated more as equals by the
intelligent trans-ontological entities that contact and/or abduct us during
what could be considered as “extraterrestrial (or non-human) multidimensional incursions,”
we will be forced to meet an existential challenge demanding us to be able to intuitively
treat reality beyond the limited metaphysics of natural realism and its
associated physicalism.
Besides the possibility of there
being a dark, elitist, evil-intended “cabal” within the secrecy control group(s),
perhaps wanting to limit human knowledge and to hoard all extraterrestrial-multidimensional
technology for itself, no wonder that even “white hat,” decision-making
elements “in the know” within such enclaves of the military-industrial complex
(those willing to disclose, educate and promote a global conversation about
advanced non-human entities co-existing with us) are also legitimately weary
about whether we can (as a global species) really handle such a full,
ontological, existential, historical disclosure without reaching destructive
levels of disruption in our already conflicted societies.
However, the question arises whether
the option to adapt or to “rise to the occasion” already exist in us and actualizing
it merely becomes a matter of consciously working with certain subtle energy
levels in connection to a global meta theoretical and transdisciplinary education
as may be implied by practitioners of an integral approach?
At any rate, do we have the
wherewithal? Does it lie in currently dormant genes or in how these connect
with subtle energy levels? Will it be activated in some of us during a “frequency
shift” as mentioned by some contactees and channelers in the more spiritual
side of the “UFO Community” or individually waiting and preparing is this comfortably
situated in the middle class and/or in a developed country is, after all,
wishful thinking, escapism, and a way to dodge personal responsibilities
towards each other and the planet?
Or, will the option to adapt
perhaps require us to be upgraded - or at any rate - upgrade ourselves via
genetic modification? Does the need for this upgrade justify much of the abduction
activities the “government in the know” is weary or unwilling to publicly
inform us about? Do they know that, unless we make the enormous effort to change
ourselves (which they doubt as they analyze history, geopolitics, regressive
movements, and the cultural wars happening across the globe), we will only
partially survive as a species if we allow others to abduct and modify our
genes? But how can they be OK with this
if the main purpose of these elements of the “government in the know” is to
defend a nation and its citizens from enemies within and without?
The conversation we need is damn
serious. Who is sufficiently prepared to have it at a sufficiently
comprehensive level in the name of truth whether it accommodates with what we
want to believe or not? A conversation is
necessary hopefully leading to re-thinking ourselves towards greater collective
harmony rather than worse dangers and dystopia or chaos. but major collective shifts
in values and in how we do things often come from desperate situations; thus,
and from adapting to major crises. Also, from what technological innovations
offer, to movers and shakers and to the rest to start a new way of life. Thus,
the industrial revolution and an end to an entire way of life. What was more
effective to (almost) ending slavery in America and the rest of the world? Technological
innovation or decades of ethical dissent, discourse?
But why are so many people still
enslaved in the world today? Because such human exploitation continues to be a practical
means for individual enrichment in many parts of the world and human nature (instinctively
experiencing life as an insecure, win-lose proposition) has not changed?
Therefore, how can we more carefully
assess trans-ontological entities that appear to act upon “our” world and also
suddenly disappear from our experiential reality? How can we do it when we are
instinctively programmed by eons of pre-agricultural evolution to distrust the
foreigner and to pay focused attention to potential dangers? How can we consider
them part of us or “our other selves” if we constantly compete and dismiss each
other, for instance, based on race, ethnicity, or religion? Can we accept that we
may have made a pre-life agreement with some of them to allow them to abduct us
all the while materialist scientists and ‘serious, credible” influential
leaders dismiss this idea as an obvious imaginative fabrication? Can we accept that some of these beings could
have been on Earth longer than we have been and even modified our genetic makeup in positive and deleterious ways?
How can we accept being kindly
and brotherly treated by “superior beings” if we as superior beings exert
intolerable disgrace and suffering on animals?
The evolution of this situation points
toward the re-creation of an Earth human that can overcome the strictures of an
earthly physicalist life; that is born with (or has educated himself into) a
sense of unity prevailing over a sense of separation even if his life is
physically dense. According to many
positive contact cases (such as those within Mission Rahma), humans can overcome their present state and levels of
consciousness. There is that or a regression,
and a loss of freedom under dictatorial control or even replacement or
extinction. So, those humans “in the know” willing to fight as true warriors
defending human potential and even a higher version of the American Dream would
have to fight – once again – against all odds, as true heroes in the name of
the highest calling.
Those non-homo sapiens beings
that want us to evolve for the good wait for us to give something original to
the universe, despite how we behave today. Then again others do not want us to be more
powerful than them and many do not trust what we are going to do once we “awake.”
So, these want to suppress, replace, or control us. Beings associated with both groups contributed
to our genetic make-up and know that we can be more powerful than them. Accordingly,
some human leaders believe in the basic goodness of people and some do not and both
tend to align themselves in consequence to that. Some want democracies to
improve and people to come together more rationally, internationally in synergy,
and ethically. Others prefer a strong man and/or group imposing its truths to the
rest.
Comments
Post a Comment