Giorgio Piacenza

Why can’t multiple, valid interpretations of quantum mechanics coexist or be equally correct? Because mathematics doesn’t allow it? OK, but under an expanded philosophical metaphysical understanding (that may be more fundamental than the fact that until now the mathematics don’t match), these interpretations could be compatible. The mathematics can follow. According to human experience and ancient wisdom traditions, the non-physical subtle, mental, or astral realm is ontologically real in its own right. But we can also consider it ontologically potential with respect to the physical universe, This would be a key issue that impinges on the mysteries of quantum physics. So, from a higher, more inclusive logic that uses a "both-and" premise (like that of Archie J. Bahm’s “Organicism” and in integral and transdisciplinary thinking --- check it out), it can be understood as both real and potentially real. In that sense, it is deterministic (compatible with Bohm-Hinley’s pilot wav...

                                Inter-Reality Portals: Wormholes Related to Consciousness? By Giorgio Piacenza   Introduction Many scientists believe we are more likely to travel to other star systems through wormholes than by Faster Than Light technology. In other words, they think Stargate is a more likely scenario than Star Trek. In this paper, I am going to explore the possibility of another kind of wormhole. In relation to UAP “anomalous” phenomena are we dealing with something different to the standard relativistic interpretation about wormholes focused on quantitative, massive applications of energy, limited to connecting different spacetime coordinates and/or different universes? Is there a key role for consciousness in non-human “UAP science?”               First, materialist ufology is insufficient to understand the ...